The “Super Secrets” of Fanatics, intellectuals spare us your atheistic morality

I went to a movie called article 370. In a scene the actress passionately read out the dialogue that “the problem is of politics and money.” No ma’am/sir the problem is of religious domination. Money and politics are subsets of the main problem. Till you are even capable and bold enough to address the actual problem, you won’t be solving anything. You are applying blam to knee for the fractured skull. Let me explain this specifically to people like you. Please spare us the pseudo-morality.

What do these religious text (Bible, Quran, Scientology, Geeta to name a few) obsessed readers have something in common?

They have read their respective text several times.
They create extended if not different meanings and interpretations every time they iterate the process.
Every time they read it, they feel there is still more secrets to be discovered.
They believe that they will reach a secret that was left undiscovered by several generations and millions of readers before them.
They find a higher calling and purpose of life in these texts.
Over time, these texts fry the mind enough that people tend to find quantum physics embedded in these texts.
It also gives a sense of supiriority, grouping and distinction.
Rarely, some of the humans do have a spiritual epiphany. Some will have it, most will have a psychological breakdown.

The human mind can not be contained and when one book becomes a source of authority over the human mind, it leaves the human mind impaired. Finally, a person feels that the divine wisdom that one receives must be delivered to the world. Some are ready to listen but most are not. Others have their own beliefs.

“How could the surrounding inferior minds possess different views and how dare they claim they could reach my level of realisation? They must be shown the truth and light.” These views leads to missionary organisations.

The Geeta was not able to inspire the person it was intended for, Arjuna. How could you understand the Geeta, when Arjuna who received the knowledge first hand did not believe in it? Krishna was forced to use his supernatural abilities and showed his celestial form to force Arjuna to abide by his plan.

Any organisation offering heaven, god, infinity, alien heaven, immortality, monetary support, etcetera for your support and belief is a cult of fanatics. If the reward does not inspire you then they try the tactic of fear on you. Heaven offers different packages and treats but hell is always a punishing pit of torture.

Real God is like air and water available to all and everywhere. If someone is offering something special that is available no where else. It is a fraud. The only son of God, the last prophet, the selected one, a group of the selected one, all of these titles of exclusivity are used by grand con schemes.

If you join these organisations, you are dedicating your life to a “higher cause.” You will be discouraged by questions and even if the questioning is allowed, it will be bounded by a certain frame set. The biggest way to find a person of such affiliation is often the greetings and departing salutations. You say hi or bye and they reply with “Hail Mary”, “Namakharam”, “Jai Guru Dev”, etcetera. These salutations are not linguistically inherited rather people either pick them up or people are constantly corrected to do so.

All religions are cults posing as culture. I say it because there is always a barrier between humans and god and that barrier is crossed by faith, love and devotion only. There is no finite time and specific method to get to god. They want you to spread their mission. There will be a day when there will be no more empty minds to follow the empty sermons and on that day the cults will collide. My imaginary friend is better than your imaginary friends.

One day in the Islamic world, a man spat in the air and said I am spitting at Allah. He was mob lynched. Neither the spit reached Allah nor anybody was sure that Allah resided in the direction where the spit was going. The revenge of Allah is taken by humans who have never encountered Allah. When a belief becomes so firm, it will always lead to suicide bombers. These are the super missionaries. “You shall seize to exist, if you do not believe in my way. We will wait to get our rewards in heaven but you must go to hell now.”

Now coming back to politics. The politics of humans is petty. The politics of the spiritual world is vile, wide and continual. The world of humans is a playground for them. We are to them like cattle is to us. We are given just enough knowledge to know the curated story. We are fed so that we could fight their mission. Miracle for one, serve inspiration to millions and millions await their pain to be reduced. Instead they become tools to God and their messengers.

An atheist and I are stable enough to not die for a god but the person who wants to kill us for his god is right outside our door. What will you do then? When a mob forms, it is made up of a uniting ideology or there is an segregating identity of intended victims. Yes, there is money, political support and even divine inspiration involved.

Don’t underestimate reach of fanaticism and spiritual politics either. It “inspires” doctors, engineers and scientists. The tools and knowledge of years enable these highly functional individuals to plan better to serve the higher cause.

Let me clarify a few things. In my understanding, the Gods and other entities are as real as any human being is. Their intentions and their identity help me to understand who they are. If you don’t believe in the domain of god and you want to direct the actual issue towards “money and politics” for your greater sense of morality and secularism then one day you or your lineage shall pay for your ignorance. Fanaticism is rampant these days, it is even socially enabled where overly accepting people are present. Grooming gangs are “part and parcel of modern society.”

I do not wish to live in a society where I could be harmed because of some “higher goal.” I have the right to exist and no god, belief, community or law have precedence over my life.

The truth shall continue to exist whether you believe in it or not

Page 1/2:

There was a NEWS channel debate. Two representatives were debating whether God Raam ate non-vegetarian food or not. One was adamant that Raam was a vegetarian and the other was fixed that Raam was not. None of the two had ever met God Raam and probably did not even feel his Tattva but both of them were sure about what they knew. In Hinduism, this state is called Mada. Mada (मद) is a state where one is stubbornly confident about his alignment regardless of what the truth is. There is also a word Mada-Masta, which translates as getting uncontrollably excited in the Mada and performing selfish or pleasurable activities without consideration from another. There is also the term Maha-Mada, Super Mada, generally, it is used to define Muhammad.

Religious fantasy author Devdutt Patnaik explains the concept of multiple truths. He explains my truth versus your truth kind of thing. For me, there are no multiple truths. There could be truth, assumptions in the pursuit of truth and fallacies. There could be multiple explanations of truth and these explanations must converge to similar understanding. True truth can remain undiscovered and unapproachable but it shall only be one. It’s not a matter of philosophy. Till Kundalini came to me, I was adamant that nothing like god could exist. Once Kundalini came, I began to wonder what it was and the implication was that there exists a field of life which was completely undiscovered and unapproachable till that point. Maximum human beings will die without experiencing what I experienced and that truth will be unapproachable to them.

Faith and belief are the assumptions that are somewhere between truth and lie. The problem with faith is that it becomes an intricate identity and people feel discomfort or threatened when their identities are proven wrong. What if the God you worshipped for years, in the ignorance of your faith, turned out to be the actual evil? The possibility of being wrong is lost in faith and that is the biggest problem. The wide concepts of God, the creation and the creator, are supposed to be the most complex topics and even in this age of science people believe that people a thousand years back understood these concepts completely. Even scientists can not boast of understanding the universe completely but some people who were told the stories by other semi-literate people take these stories as the complete truth. The secret is only revealed to the people of “faith”. Schizophrenia is considered a non-communicable disease, I must as if it truly is. Schizophrenia is transmissible by faith.

I am not an atheist. I know about the holy spirits, angels, malaikahs and the Devtas but my understanding comes from my experiences. I do not allow second-hand statements to become the definition of my life. In my understanding, these things are metered and these are not incomprehensible. You are free to call it my opinion or insanity but this is my faith. You have the full right to criticize it, I do not harm people, those who question me. Kundalini is not my property either. Many people describe it and I give my explanation too. You could also feel it if you can gain it by Shatipaath (Given by Guru), Dev Kripa (Given by Devta) or if it happens spontaneously. Neither I own it, nor I am the only source for it. For me, truth is the sanctity of life.

I am not against fantasies, faith and stories but if a fantasy defines your life then it is an issue. I am against selective acceptance too. I often met people who say that there are no ghosts, spirits and similar entities and in the next statement they say that there is something like a power that governs the universe. See to me atheism is completely fine but this hypocrisy of selective acceptance is the highest of the mischief. Let me explain why. The idea of central authority comes from religion. God is a product of religion and belief. The literature from which the “power that controls the universe” comes from that very literature defines these other entities. If someone does this selective acceptance in fear of the unknown is understandable but if someone just accepts the creator and not the creation, well such a person is just full of Mada.

Continued on next page…

Satyameva Jayete, Truth alone shall triumph?

It is the dialogue which is constantly used in TV shows and movies. Truth alone shall Triumph but the truth is that several times is seen that the lies triumph and the victims suffer. There are many dead bodies buried under the dirt of lies. The powerful Triumph that is also a reality. Sometimes we prefer to live in lies because lies are convenient. Sometimes discovery of the truth is expensive. This line Satyameva Jayete is taken out of context.

The truth shall continue to exist whether you believe in it or not.

What is the truth? After the transfer of power in 1947, a committee was formed to draft the constitution of India. During those times citizens of India were very touchy about religious aspects. We had seen several riots and enough bloodshed to take the matter of belief seriously and to avoid anything that could create a rise in citizens.

The constitution incorporated the right of Religious Freedom. Now the subject is touched, defined and avoided in a very political way. First, the definition of religion is left to the interpretation, no hard definition is defined. Second, if we go through the section which deals with the subject, these topics are defined just to address religion in terms of the law. Not for the existence of religion itself. The subject of understanding religion is avoided. I can not comment on the understanding of individuals of the drafting and reviewing committee of the Indian constitution but in my personal opinion it feels more like the constitution allows people to have “imaginary friends” within the boundary of laws. It allows people to have imaginary friends and they could perform festivities and rituals for their imaginary friends.

Just like any other subject, like science. Religion is to be explored. We are allowed to discover and question any aspect of it but it is preferred that it must be done in a hushed manner because people tend to kill and die for their imaginary friends. An honest person never aims for sensation or debate, such a person just seeks. He only discusses his understanding and thought process around the subject. Even today, we have gatekeepers in the world of science too. Einstein faced resistance from these gatekeepers and we must expect no less while dealing with a subject that is based on adamant faith. The gatekeepers of religion are the most stubborn, if not stupid people around.

I feel that the constitution of India and the makers of the laws are dishonest about the topic of religion. They are desperately trying to distance themselves from religion but instead, their selective ignorance is hindering peoples’ fundamental right to exist. I also question the eligibility of constitution-makers to address the subject. The Indian courts recently discussed the impact of firecrackers of the Deepawali festival on the pollution of Delhi city. Studies were provided by scientific institutes that the impact of three days of the festival was not that severe and also suggested the real culprit was the season and stubble burning. The judges commented that no study is needed to prove that firecrackers cause pollution. Sometimes the “common sense” of gatekeepers superseded the systematic scientific studies. Similarly, the laws which dwell in ambiguous zones could sometimes use “common sense” instead of available research. I have already stated that sometimes the truth is too expensive to afford.

Many people know the length and breadth of the subject. You are free to term it anything, religion, faith, spirituality, way of life, some people know the subject intricately. These people are sidelined and people who deal in subjects like laws and humanities make the decisions for the subjects outside of their understanding. Religious leaders are not the ones to be consulted. They are just like influencers. Just like we have chess experts and chess influencers, similarly the people who understand religion and the domain of god are different from the people who sell the concept of god. The weirdos and the obsessed are the real deal. Ask them what is god, what is religion? Their understanding will pave the way to actual religious harmony.

The constitution formers had the idea of UCC (Uniform Civil Code). One unified law to guide a nation. This will again cause more troubles and issues instead of resolving things. It is currently being considered but I do not know if the actual subject matter experts are being brought in. See again I would say that if the topic of religion is to be handled scientifically instead by “common sense” and belief, otherwise blood shall continue to flow. UCC (Uniform Civil Code) will just end up hurting the “imaginary friends” and in turn, real human friends of imaginary friends will hurt each other. If the laws are ambiguous that law itself is criminal.

I do not care if a person has a belief but to hell with a belief that supercedes my existence. I do not wish to be hurt or die because a person has an imaginary friend. My existence for myself is above any law, god or community.

Truth is never defeated but it could be buried by faith, propaganda, common sense and power. Well, the truth always wins in the end but it is not written anywhere how much time will it take for the truth to win. Generations, cultures and communities have been eliminated awaiting the victory of truth. Today we discuss their truth but they do not exist to experience this victory of the truth. Ask the questions, who is Ram and who is Rahim? Why do we fight on their name, when we haven’t seen either? Offend each other. Discover the truth. Truth is expensive, could you afford it or will you take solace in your convenient lies? Life is deep, I do not expect you to not be afraid but learn to differentiate between truth and belief.