The “Super Secrets” of Fanatics, intellectuals spare us your atheistic morality

I went to a movie called article 370. In a scene the actress passionately read out the dialogue that “the problem is of politics and money.” No ma’am/sir the problem is of religious domination. Money and politics are subsets of the main problem. Till you are even capable and bold enough to address the actual problem, you won’t be solving anything. You are applying blam to knee for the fractured skull. Let me explain this specifically to people like you. Please spare us the pseudo-morality.

What do these religious text (Bible, Quran, Scientology, Geeta to name a few) obsessed readers have something in common?

They have read their respective text several times.
They create extended if not different meanings and interpretations every time they iterate the process.
Every time they read it, they feel there is still more secrets to be discovered.
They believe that they will reach a secret that was left undiscovered by several generations and millions of readers before them.
They find a higher calling and purpose of life in these texts.
Over time, these texts fry the mind enough that people tend to find quantum physics embedded in these texts.
It also gives a sense of supiriority, grouping and distinction.
Rarely, some of the humans do have a spiritual epiphany. Some will have it, most will have a psychological breakdown.

The human mind can not be contained and when one book becomes a source of authority over the human mind, it leaves the human mind impaired. Finally, a person feels that the divine wisdom that one receives must be delivered to the world. Some are ready to listen but most are not. Others have their own beliefs.

“How could the surrounding inferior minds possess different views and how dare they claim they could reach my level of realisation? They must be shown the truth and light.” These views leads to missionary organisations.

The Geeta was not able to inspire the person it was intended for, Arjuna. How could you understand the Geeta, when Arjuna who received the knowledge first hand did not believe in it? Krishna was forced to use his supernatural abilities and showed his celestial form to force Arjuna to abide by his plan.

Any organisation offering heaven, god, infinity, alien heaven, immortality, monetary support, etcetera for your support and belief is a cult of fanatics. If the reward does not inspire you then they try the tactic of fear on you. Heaven offers different packages and treats but hell is always a punishing pit of torture.

Real God is like air and water available to all and everywhere. If someone is offering something special that is available no where else. It is a fraud. The only son of God, the last prophet, the selected one, a group of the selected one, all of these titles of exclusivity are used by grand con schemes.

If you join these organisations, you are dedicating your life to a “higher cause.” You will be discouraged by questions and even if the questioning is allowed, it will be bounded by a certain frame set. The biggest way to find a person of such affiliation is often the greetings and departing salutations. You say hi or bye and they reply with “Hail Mary”, “Namakharam”, “Jai Guru Dev”, etcetera. These salutations are not linguistically inherited rather people either pick them up or people are constantly corrected to do so.

All religions are cults posing as culture. I say it because there is always a barrier between humans and god and that barrier is crossed by faith, love and devotion only. There is no finite time and specific method to get to god. They want you to spread their mission. There will be a day when there will be no more empty minds to follow the empty sermons and on that day the cults will collide. My imaginary friend is better than your imaginary friends.

One day in the Islamic world, a man spat in the air and said I am spitting at Allah. He was mob lynched. Neither the spit reached Allah nor anybody was sure that Allah resided in the direction where the spit was going. The revenge of Allah is taken by humans who have never encountered Allah. When a belief becomes so firm, it will always lead to suicide bombers. These are the super missionaries. “You shall seize to exist, if you do not believe in my way. We will wait to get our rewards in heaven but you must go to hell now.”

Now coming back to politics. The politics of humans is petty. The politics of the spiritual world is vile, wide and continual. The world of humans is a playground for them. We are to them like cattle is to us. We are given just enough knowledge to know the curated story. We are fed so that we could fight their mission. Miracle for one, serve inspiration to millions and millions await their pain to be reduced. Instead they become tools to God and their messengers.

An atheist and I are stable enough to not die for a god but the person who wants to kill us for his god is right outside our door. What will you do then? When a mob forms, it is made up of a uniting ideology or there is an segregating identity of intended victims. Yes, there is money, political support and even divine inspiration involved.

Don’t underestimate reach of fanaticism and spiritual politics either. It “inspires” doctors, engineers and scientists. The tools and knowledge of years enable these highly functional individuals to plan better to serve the higher cause.

Let me clarify a few things. In my understanding, the Gods and other entities are as real as any human being is. Their intentions and their identity help me to understand who they are. If you don’t believe in the domain of god and you want to direct the actual issue towards “money and politics” for your greater sense of morality and secularism then one day you or your lineage shall pay for your ignorance. Fanaticism is rampant these days, it is even socially enabled where overly accepting people are present. Grooming gangs are “part and parcel of modern society.”

I do not wish to live in a society where I could be harmed because of some “higher goal.” I have the right to exist and no god, belief, community or law have precedence over my life.

Satyameva Jayete, Truth alone shall triumph?

It is the dialogue which is constantly used in TV shows and movies. Truth alone shall Triumph but the truth is that several times is seen that the lies triumph and the victims suffer. There are many dead bodies buried under the dirt of lies. The powerful Triumph that is also a reality. Sometimes we prefer to live in lies because lies are convenient. Sometimes discovery of the truth is expensive. This line Satyameva Jayete is taken out of context.

The truth shall continue to exist whether you believe in it or not.

What is the truth? After the transfer of power in 1947, a committee was formed to draft the constitution of India. During those times citizens of India were very touchy about religious aspects. We had seen several riots and enough bloodshed to take the matter of belief seriously and to avoid anything that could create a rise in citizens.

The constitution incorporated the right of Religious Freedom. Now the subject is touched, defined and avoided in a very political way. First, the definition of religion is left to the interpretation, no hard definition is defined. Second, if we go through the section which deals with the subject, these topics are defined just to address religion in terms of the law. Not for the existence of religion itself. The subject of understanding religion is avoided. I can not comment on the understanding of individuals of the drafting and reviewing committee of the Indian constitution but in my personal opinion it feels more like the constitution allows people to have “imaginary friends” within the boundary of laws. It allows people to have imaginary friends and they could perform festivities and rituals for their imaginary friends.

Just like any other subject, like science. Religion is to be explored. We are allowed to discover and question any aspect of it but it is preferred that it must be done in a hushed manner because people tend to kill and die for their imaginary friends. An honest person never aims for sensation or debate, such a person just seeks. He only discusses his understanding and thought process around the subject. Even today, we have gatekeepers in the world of science too. Einstein faced resistance from these gatekeepers and we must expect no less while dealing with a subject that is based on adamant faith. The gatekeepers of religion are the most stubborn, if not stupid people around.

I feel that the constitution of India and the makers of the laws are dishonest about the topic of religion. They are desperately trying to distance themselves from religion but instead, their selective ignorance is hindering peoples’ fundamental right to exist. I also question the eligibility of constitution-makers to address the subject. The Indian courts recently discussed the impact of firecrackers of the Deepawali festival on the pollution of Delhi city. Studies were provided by scientific institutes that the impact of three days of the festival was not that severe and also suggested the real culprit was the season and stubble burning. The judges commented that no study is needed to prove that firecrackers cause pollution. Sometimes the “common sense” of gatekeepers superseded the systematic scientific studies. Similarly, the laws which dwell in ambiguous zones could sometimes use “common sense” instead of available research. I have already stated that sometimes the truth is too expensive to afford.

Many people know the length and breadth of the subject. You are free to term it anything, religion, faith, spirituality, way of life, some people know the subject intricately. These people are sidelined and people who deal in subjects like laws and humanities make the decisions for the subjects outside of their understanding. Religious leaders are not the ones to be consulted. They are just like influencers. Just like we have chess experts and chess influencers, similarly the people who understand religion and the domain of god are different from the people who sell the concept of god. The weirdos and the obsessed are the real deal. Ask them what is god, what is religion? Their understanding will pave the way to actual religious harmony.

The constitution formers had the idea of UCC (Uniform Civil Code). One unified law to guide a nation. This will again cause more troubles and issues instead of resolving things. It is currently being considered but I do not know if the actual subject matter experts are being brought in. See again I would say that if the topic of religion is to be handled scientifically instead by “common sense” and belief, otherwise blood shall continue to flow. UCC (Uniform Civil Code) will just end up hurting the “imaginary friends” and in turn, real human friends of imaginary friends will hurt each other. If the laws are ambiguous that law itself is criminal.

I do not care if a person has a belief but to hell with a belief that supercedes my existence. I do not wish to be hurt or die because a person has an imaginary friend. My existence for myself is above any law, god or community.

Truth is never defeated but it could be buried by faith, propaganda, common sense and power. Well, the truth always wins in the end but it is not written anywhere how much time will it take for the truth to win. Generations, cultures and communities have been eliminated awaiting the victory of truth. Today we discuss their truth but they do not exist to experience this victory of the truth. Ask the questions, who is Ram and who is Rahim? Why do we fight on their name, when we haven’t seen either? Offend each other. Discover the truth. Truth is expensive, could you afford it or will you take solace in your convenient lies? Life is deep, I do not expect you to not be afraid but learn to differentiate between truth and belief.

What is God to you?

I was a cocky teenager. I used to make provocative statements and lived in a world of grand narratives. Sometimes, I dreamt of true harmony because we were brought up utopianists with extreme Gandhian morality as our standard. The problem people like us is that we live in our heads. If the content of our heads is allowed to become a reality, most of the time, it is seen that the other heads roll. I was a pseudo-atheist because it was cool.

Yes, yes. I met with hardships and crippling pain but that pain just made me want to spit on the face of god, if it existed. If god is something external or more correctly another individual then the relationship between God and I must be like that of any worldly relationship. For me, God could not have had the titles of judge, master, creator, guide, punisher, rewarder, conqueror, parent, partner, etcetra. For me, god had to be something more intimate. Anyway, I am not the focus here. You are.

We add titles to our names, Theist, Atheist, Agnostic, etc. Do these make any sense? So let me explain. Have you ever heard a sane human questioning does the air exists or not? Though intangible in most cases, it is felt in many ways. Nowadays, we have metrics to measure it.

Similarly, we need to have definite metrics to measure the intangible. This problem of God being out of reach and God must be approached only by the feeling of servitude the root of many evil like terrorism and better than thou begins from it. The world is separated in two, us versus them. The older literature, the first of the Ved and Tantra approaches nature and entities in a very different way. The problem is the interpretation by us. The later literature taught servitude towards the eternal but the ancient literature approaches with interrogative manner. In ancient literature, anything which exists as a separate individual is explained as a transaction. The all-mighty merciful God is a recent construct.

The Gods were raping, dominating, vengeful, stubborn, hedonistic, promiscuous and cruel. This literature is similar across the Earth. Suddenly these Gods realized we can not rule over humanity with these traits and these disguised gods came into existence. Now the biggest con in this is that ancient literature gives out methods to peek into the domain of these gods, now the people who possessed these abilities were systematically eradicated in Abrahamic societies. The people with healing abilities, people with sight into the other world, and people whose knowledge could challenge the authority of god were punished for their existence. Now, you do not have any access to the domain of the god. You are forced to believe that god is something good and worthy of your worship and every such thought that questions the authority of god is to be eliminated. Doesn’t it look like a proper con scheme?

Now let’s approach this question from a different angle. You acquired your beliefs and affiliations over time. These ideologies give you identity and there is no problem in defending your beliefs. This is part of your personal space and must be respected but just like any personal opinion, if it is exposed publically, it will be no longer protected and it will be subjected to scrutiny. It will be better that you introspect thoroughly before expressing, don’t sell your belief. “Do you believe in our lord and saviour….?”, well do you truly believe? Your beliefs must not take refuge in ambiguity and agnosticism.

There are many types of people. Some use religious doctrine to defend their identities. They do not care for the understanding of the nature of God. Their goals are either to debate, take a morally superior vantage point or find refuge in an establishment. Debate is a form of entertainment, moral superiority is a defence mechanism and refuge-seeking is a way to maintain sanity when exposed to a limitless universe.

There are a few people who are touched by something which could be called divine. Shamans, Oracles, Aveshists, Clairvoyants, and even the typical “gut feeling” people have something with a touch of divine. Now these people are vulnerable as much as they are capable. If tomorrow a spirit comes and tells you I am God, gifts you with things and after earning your trust makes you a tool of their plot. Many great humans were part of such a plot line. These humans tend to become sheep of their sheperds and sheperds in the end rob their sheep of wool, meat and lambs. Why was Abraham asked for his children?

There are very few people who possess godly capabilities. Those who understand the game and choose the path of power. They invest their time and efforts to circumvent the expanse of nature. They travel deep and above to understand the equations. These people could be deemed as walking Gods on the planet. These are rare to be seen and rarer to be taken guidance from.

Finally, there is a type even rarer than the Godly people. When you have seen joy and pain, heaven and hell, holy and heinous. When you have been through multiple cycles of it then comes an onset. Where you look for an escape or something that makes much more sense. In Dharmic religions, Mukti or freedom has multiple layers. Mukti from birth death cycles is a type of Mukti and there is also a type of Mukti where an individual no longer exists. This Mukti also becomes the goal for many. Mukti is sought by many but very few look for the underlying phenomena. Why is the current state of existence different from Mukti? This question unlocks a different layer of seeking. The term “God” could mean multiple things for multiple people but what hat does it mean to you?

So what is your relationship with God? Are you an atheist and use God as a tool for your entertainment? Do you hide in God to be safe in uncertainty? Do you have the “grace” of God on you? Do you want to become a God? or the god was a fad to you and now you look for something more deeper and truly eternal?

You can be anything, believer, or nonbeliever, you can be in a state where the word belief makes no sense. A state where you are truly adamant that god does or does not exist. In all these states just don’t lie to yourself, lie to the world just not to yourself. Do not believe in things, research till you can reach an answer. A point where you no longer have to believe. Life will never stop to intrigue you.